Of the two the Blaser/Mauser is faster and easier than the Sauer, but a mandatory/dedicated scope mount is required in both cases. The R93 uses the same, twin screw, barrel retention of the M 03, the 202 has a split clamp receiver design. I own a Mauser M 03 switch barrel and am very happy with it, I am also familiar with the other systems – Blaser R93 and Sauer 202.

ĝepending on calibre you might not necessarily need a new bolt and magazine.

The initial outlay is expensive, but once you have one then it’s generally the cost of a new barrel, magazine and bolt should you wish another calibre option.

There’s normally a question mark from those new to the concept about the ability to return to zero after being re-assembled.

Normally most switch barrel systems use dedicated (and expensive) QD scope mounts.

Ěs the rifle comes apart easily it can be carried in a smaller package, which is a boon for overseas travel.

The ability to switch calibres means you have one, familiar gun that can do whatever you ask of it.

This offers both plus and minus points, given the design and build quality offered: If you are not aware the principle of a switch barrel is simple, as they are built so the barrel and bolt system can be easily removed and the chassis re-fitted with another calibre set. Frankly this is a smart move as it brings the company on line with the similar designs. Historically the original company - Mannlicher Schoenauer offered a take-down rifle in their Model 1905 and this concept has been combined with the elegant SM Luxus of 1977.

So the announcement they were introducing a switch barrel (The Luxus) got me interested. I have to admit to liking Steyr Mannlicher (SM) rifles, as I owned one of their Scout models for nearly five years and I reckon their ProHunter is good too.

Steyr mannlicher luxus standard